Removing him is probably a

by Nathan Hamm on 9/12/2003

Removing him is probably a ridiculously bad idea, but when Arafat says things like this:

“Arafat emerged from his compound in Ramallah for a second
straight night Friday and rallied hundreds of supporters, saying: ‘To
Jerusalem we are going as martyrs in the millions.’
The crowd held photos of Arafat and chanted: ‘With our blood and souls
we will redeem you.’ Arafat answered: ‘With our blood and souls, we
will redeem you Palestine.'”

it gets a little hard for anyone
but those who ascribe every vile act in the world to be the result of
US/Israeli actions (someone has to have a good name for Noam’s theory)
to say that Arafat does not incite terrorism. Michael Totten is right, there’s no good choice and the status quo might be the most preferable option.

Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 2991 posts on 17_PersonNotFound.

Nathan is the founder and Principal Analyst for Registan, which he launched in 2003. He was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Uzbekistan 2000-2001 and received his MA in Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington in 2007. Since 2007, he has worked full-time as an analyst, consulting with private and government clients on Central Asian affairs, specializing in how socio-cultural and political factors shape risks and opportunities and how organizations can adjust their strategic and operational plans to account for these variables. More information on Registan's services can be found here, and Nathan can be contacted via Twitter or email.

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

Previous post:

Next post: