From the Annals of Bad Reporting

by Nathan Hamm on 7/31/2004

The Straits-Times:

An Uzbek Islamic party, Hizbi Tahrir, claimed responsibility on an Internet site yesterday for the triple bombings.

The radical Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan had earlier claimed responsibility for the attacks on the same website.

What the hell?

I’m assuming that all these reports saying that responsibility was claimed on a website are referring to the same thing. Bad reporting makes it hard to figure this out. I’m sticking to Islamic Jihad Group, the guys who probably did the March bombings. Upyernoz, who’s admittedly far from fluent in Arabic, saw only Islamic Jihad on the website that was reported by AFP. Check out this post for more.


Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 2991 posts on 17_PersonNotFound.

Nathan is the founder and Principal Analyst for Registan, which he launched in 2003. He was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Uzbekistan 2000-2001 and received his MA in Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington in 2007. Since 2007, he has worked full-time as an analyst, consulting with private and government clients on Central Asian affairs, specializing in how socio-cultural and political factors shape risks and opportunities and how organizations can adjust their strategic and operational plans to account for these variables. More information on Registan's services can be found here, and Nathan can be contacted via Twitter or email.

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

Previous post:

Next post: