The Crazy, Trumped Up Uzbek Hype

by Joshua Foust on 1/24/2012 · 8 comments

Yesterday, U.S. federal counterterrorism agents descended on O’Hare International Airport to arrest an Uzbek man, Jamshid Muhktarov, on charges of terrorism.

According to U.S. investigators, Jamshid Mukhtarov was working with Islamic Jihad Union, an affiliate of al-Qaeda, when he was arrested Saturday night at O’Hare while changing planes for an overseas flight.

Mukhtarov, 35, a refugee from Uzbekistan, had been residing in Aurora, Colorado, outside Denver. According to these charges and an affidavit under federal court seal since last March, Mukhtarov pledged to commit foreign terrorist acts, even if it meant dying.

This is one of a number of U.S. terrorism cases that involve, essentially, arresting people for sending emails. But there’s more to the case.

Court documents show Muhtorov told suspected terrorists he was “ready for any task, even with the risk of dying.” …

West says Muhtorov was arrested early, before he had enough training to carry out an attack.

“He doesn’t know how to build a bomb. He doesn’t know how to plan a terrorist attack. He just has the desire. It’s these kinds of early arrests that really nip future attacks in the bud,” West said.

That West fellow works for STRATFOR so… well. The arrest affidavit (pdf) is interesting as well. Mukhtarov was apparently in email contact with “the IJU” and had apparently pledged “e-bayah,” or a life-pledge, to some suspected member of the IJU before boarding a flight to Turkey.

This is awfully thin stuff for a terrorism investigation — essentially criminalizing participation in a chat room. It’s also, sadly, not uncommon for U.S.-based terrorism cases (which often convict on really thin evidence more often than many Americans would likely feel comfortable about). But it’s also part of a larger global freak out about Uzbeks.

Unpacking the “Uzbeks are scary” is a recurring theme here on Registan.net, and there is a recent cluster of stories about them that bear further discussion. For starters, there’s this IJU group, which still doesn’t exist outside of some Internet chat rooms. The one thing the IJU has supposedly done — some bombings in Tashkent in 2004, was identified by the SNB, the Uzbek secret police. The SNB are also fond of labeling every dissident religious leader in the country an IMU or IJU terrorist as well. Based on their recommendation, the U.S. government classified the IJU a foreign terrorist organization and made it a crime to communicate with them (or to “provide material support”). In other words, the U.S. government is doing the Uzbek government’s dirty work for it, about a group that probably doesn’t really exist. And they do this a lot: a few years ago Registan.net contributor Sarah Kendzior wrote a brilliant article about how the regime in Tashkent invented another group, Akromiya, to justify its massacre in Andijon.

So the IJU probably isn’t even a real thing, yet was still used to arrest this guy for the crime of sending some emails then boarding a plane. What about other Uzbeks? In the Asia Times, JZ Adams makes the case:

The Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) in November released on its website, alfurqon.com, a list of its “martyrs” of 2011. The most striking aspect of the list, with its biographies and profile photographs written in the Cyrillic alphabet of the Uzbek language, is that only four of the 87 martyrs were from Uzbekistan.

The list shows how the IMU has evolved from being a group focused on overthrowing the “apostate” regime of Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan in the late 1990s and early 2000s into the global jihadi movement that it is now. Neither the biographies nor the preface to the list focus on Uzbekistan, and while 64 martyrs come from Afghanistan, 10 were from Tajikistan, six from Kyrgyzstan, with one each from Tatarstan (Russia), Germany and Pakistan.

Okay… so this too is basically all wrong. All of it. It is patently ridiculous to call the IMU a “global jihad threat,” while only talking about some things they do in Northwest Pakistan. While only a few martyrs came from Uzbekistan, there were a lot more Uzbek-sounding names on that list. I met a lot of Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan (not “from” Uzbekistan, mind you) who spoke openly of joining the IMU in response to the pervasive bias they experienced there. Similarly, the guys from Afghanistan probably come from the huge Uzbek enclaves either in Balkh or Zabul. And further, when 3% of the names come from outside Central Asia, and those Central Asian countries represented also host huge Uzbek minorities, it’s just not accurate to call the movement “global.” Maybe, MAYBE regional, but definitely not global. It’s over-hyped rubbish.

Later, Adams writes scary things about how the IMU is moving into Northern Afghanistan and threatening the U.S. withdrawal. What would you expect an Islamist terror group to focus on? By 2011 they’ve been fighting or resisting the U.S. military for as long as they’d been trying to topple the Karimov regime — and the U.S. military been much better at killing or capturing them than Karimov or Akaev ever were. We should expect them to recruit locally to expand their ranks, and to focus on U.S. plans in the region.

Sadly, this isn’t new. The Ferghana Valley is a constant source of terrible, evidence-free implication-fests about the frightening Uzbek Menace about to sweep the world into terror and darkness. To this day, minor criminal issues are blamed on AL-QAEDA TAKING OVER acts of fear mongering. Everyone from Ahmed Rashid to even Barnett Rubin (whom I respect a great deal) to Reuters have fallen for this trap: assuming that a few incidents somewhere indicate some ginormous threat to global security.

Really, the threat from Uzbek terror groups is local. They barely have a presence, to say nothing of capability, in the Ferghana Valley anymore. Most of what they do is confined to their hideouts in Northwest Pakistan (mostly Waziristan). That is its own problem, make no mistake about it. But it hardly rises to the level of a massive threat requiring a massive response to counter it.

And as for Jamshid Muhtorov? His case will probably proceed like most of the other thought-crime counterterrorism cases before him: it will go to trial, some self-made Internet lurker like Evan Kohlmann will say some emails and a video means he’s totally a terrorist, and a jury will freak out at the word ISLAM and send him to prison for 15 years.

Justice will be served.


Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 1848 posts on 17_PersonNotFound.

Joshua Foust is a Fellow at the American Security Project and the author of Afghanistan Journal: Selections from Registan.net. His research focuses primarily on Central and South Asia. Joshua is a correspondent for The Atlantic and a columnist for PBS Need to Know. Joshua appears regularly on the BBC World News, Aljazeera, and international public radio. Joshua's writing has appeared in the Columbia Journalism Review, Foreign Policy’s AfPak Channel, the New York Times, Reuters, and the Christian Science Monitor. Follow him on twitter: @joshuafoust

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

{ 8 comments }

Sarah Kendzior January 24, 2012 at 11:10 am

Great post — I’ve got to run but I’ll comment more later. However, I’m wondering if anyone knows whether the Jamshid Muxtorov who was arrested is the same as the human rights activist profiled in 2006:

http://www.fergananews.com/article.php?id=4142

Sarah Kendzior January 24, 2012 at 1:07 pm

I have confirmed that this is indeed the same Jamshid Muxtorov of the Jizzakh branch of the Ezgulik human rights movement who was run out of Uzbekistan on trumped-up terrorist charges after the Andijon events. There is a lot about this story that makes me question the veracity of the FBI’s allegations. (Aside from the points that Joshua has already raised.)

Sarah Kendzior January 24, 2012 at 2:05 pm

Registan actually covered the persecution of Jamshid Muxtorov — this time in Uzbekistan — back in 2005:

http://www.registan.net/index.php/2005/12/27/dzhizak-authorities-continue-campaign-of-violence-against-activists/

(If I can find time, I will write a full post instead of appending my own comments. But I’m surprised I’m the only one making this connection.)

Sarah Kendzior January 24, 2012 at 2:34 pm

OK, one more comment. I would like to hear others’ opinions on this case. There is a lot of material on Muxtorov, but this 2006 testimony, translated into English, is particularly interesting:

http://clpmag.org/article.php?article=After-Andijan_124

An except from Muxtorov’s story, in his own words:

“…After the Andijan Massacre, Human Rights Watch released a magazine condemning the government’s actions. I copied this magazine and circulated it as widely as I could. It seems that law enforcement agencies and authorities also received the magazine. After this pressure against human rights workers increased, I was put on house arrest along with all of my colleagues. Authorities even organized a pro-government rally in Djizzak and many human rights workers were tortured by participants.

In January of 2006, I was arrested on rape charges and beaten by the arresting officers who made it clear that my beating was a result of my activism. Both my brother and sister were also arrested on false charges. My sister, who is 20, was accused of murdering a taxi driver over a fare.

One morning, soon after that, I was sitting having my breakfast when someone knocked on my door and warned me that the Minister of International Affairs had ordered that I be taken under arrest. At first I thought this was just another form of intimidation, but when I asked a close friend who also worked on human rights, she said that the government was coming for all of us and that we had to flee the country.

I was smuggled over the border into Kyrgyzstan wearing women’s clothes that night. My wife and two small children joined me five days later. We have no official status as political refugees. I can’t work here because we have no papers; we are receiving a little money to live off of from different organizations.

I know that we can’t go home until President Karimov is ousted. I’m sure that if I were to return now I would be killed. It is hard to maintain hope that things will change and we will be able to return home — everyone is so afraid after what happened in Andijan. But there is an election in 2007 and I know that the people despise Islom Karimov. They know that he is only a puppet master that speaks good and popular words that mean nothing to us.”

Dilshod January 24, 2012 at 11:31 am

1) It takes him to blow a bomb to be tried, doesn’t it?
2) Imho, to understand Akramiyya, one needs to look beyond formal frameworks employed in respect of private initiatives. True Akramiyya was not a registered or could be registered entity, it was a network of people who got together based on shared conviction that the teaching of Mr Yuldashev was the right way to go. The degree of consolidation of the network is unkown to me. Informal networks here play larger role as has been existing for centuries.

Xenophon January 24, 2012 at 6:37 pm

Why do you use the word “crazy” in your title? It’s not crazy at all. It’s a confluence of two overriding factors:

1. The creeping authoritarianism that is slowly and systematically subverting the US Constitution and the legal structure based on it.
2. The perceived geopolitical imperative of US-Uzbek cooperation.

Your use of the word “thoughtcrime,” Foust, tells me that you are gradually being forced to confront realities. Be careful, though–the red pill tastes bad.

Personally, I think that two minutes of hate for Muxtorov are in order.

Alyssa January 26, 2012 at 6:25 am

Sarah, you are not the only one making this connection: http://www.ozodlik.org/content/article/24462176.html

Sarah Kendzior January 26, 2012 at 6:32 am

Thanks Alyssa. I saw that — it was posted a few hours after my comments.

Previous post:

Next post: