<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long-Term Bases in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2005/03/16/long-term-bases-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/03/16/long-term-bases-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Central Asia News -- All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/03/16/long-term-bases-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7855</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=4723#comment-7855</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. can&#039;t find what I was looking for, so maybe you&#039;re right.  I know that the 2002 aid package that was so often criticized for being so big was about half payments for Karshi -- not what we traditionally consider aid.

If geopolitics are a major concern though, having an option to move all operations to Afghanistan is still a powerful lever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. can&#8217;t find what I was looking for, so maybe you&#8217;re right.  I know that the 2002 aid package that was so often criticized for being so big was about half payments for Karshi &#8212; not what we traditionally consider aid.</p>
<p>If geopolitics are a major concern though, having an option to move all operations to Afghanistan is still a powerful lever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/03/16/long-term-bases-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7846</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=4723#comment-7846</guid>
		<description>Yes an Afghan base would be interesting, but I don&#039;t think the US is paying any rent at all for Khanabad, you can check this, but I believe use of the air base was provided free as a gift by the Uzbek government to support US operations in Afghanistan.

Uzbekistan has geopolitical reasons ro want a US presence, to balance other powers including Russia and China, in order to maintain a little independent wriggle-room...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes an Afghan base would be interesting, but I don&#8217;t think the US is paying any rent at all for Khanabad, you can check this, but I believe use of the air base was provided free as a gift by the Uzbek government to support US operations in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Uzbekistan has geopolitical reasons ro want a US presence, to balance other powers including Russia and China, in order to maintain a little independent wriggle-room&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

