<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caspian Guard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/</link>
	<description>Central Asia News -- All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-17508</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 04:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-17508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran&#039;s sweet gas&lt;/strong&gt;

First there was the &quot;Caspian Guard&quot;:http://www.registan.net/?p=5188 and the expansion of GUAM but now we see Georgia looking for other ways to strengthen itself and get out from under Russia&#039;s heel. From &quot;Stratfor&quot;:http://www.stratfor.com:

bq. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran&#8217;s sweet gas</strong></p>
<p>First there was the &#8220;Caspian Guard&#8221;:<a href="http://www.registan.net/?p=5188" rel="nofollow">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188</a> and the expansion of GUAM but now we see Georgia looking for other ways to strengthen itself and get out from under Russia&#8217;s heel. From &#8220;Stratfor&#8221;:<a href="http://www.stratfor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stratfor.com</a>:</p>
<p>bq. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; More on Georgia</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16820</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; More on Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16820</guid>
		<description>[...] 			   		 	 		 			 More on Georgia 						 			 					Apropos talk of Georgia here and also at Registan.net, Eurasianet has a new article on increased aid for Georgia from the US as part of a new program call [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 			   		 	 		 			 More on Georgia 						 			 					Apropos talk of Georgia here and also at Registan.net, Eurasianet has a new article on increased aid for Georgia from the US as part of a new program call [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirol</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16814</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16814</guid>
		<description>I realise Georgian border security has long been a problem which led me to wonder why, after things had at least fallen off the news&#039; radar for awhile, that they would want to relese a report which they could just have well buried or left for later.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realise Georgian border security has long been a problem which led me to wonder why, after things had at least fallen off the news&#8217; radar for awhile, that they would want to relese a report which they could just have well buried or left for later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Registan.net &#187; It&#8217;s the little things&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16810</link>
		<dc:creator>Registan.net &#187; It&#8217;s the little things&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16810</guid>
		<description>[...] imulators for infantry are in the works as well.   	Kazakh military news is something of a theme today.  	 													 	 	 	&#160; 				            RSS feed for comments on this post.  T [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] imulators for infantry are in the works as well.   	Kazakh military news is something of a theme today.  	</p>
<p> 	&nbsp;</p>
<p> RSS feed for comments on this post.  T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praktike</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16804</link>
		<dc:creator>praktike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16804</guid>
		<description>The mention of Georgia as a waypoint for terrorists is nothing new, and AFAIK is a reference to the Pankissi Gorge, where Russia accuses Chechen terrorists of hiding out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mention of Georgia as a waypoint for terrorists is nothing new, and AFAIK is a reference to the Pankissi Gorge, where Russia accuses Chechen terrorists of hiding out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16799</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16799</guid>
		<description>At the same time, the mention may have been to add fuel to the fire to try to get outside border monitors back in. Georgia does have a hard time controlling sections of its border and Russia likes to exploit this when the rhetoric gets hot between the two. Without outside monitors, it&#039;s easier to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the same time, the mention may have been to add fuel to the fire to try to get outside border monitors back in. Georgia does have a hard time controlling sections of its border and Russia likes to exploit this when the rhetoric gets hot between the two. Without outside monitors, it&#8217;s easier to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirol</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/04/29/caspian-guard/comment-page-1/#comment-16796</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5188#comment-16796</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear you chiming in. Turkmenistan was a thought. Considering Russia and Iran, who also share the Caspian, are out of US reach/influence, and Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are already coming our way, Turkmenistan would be the only other country to possibly be courted.

As for Georgia, we&#039;ll have to see. I don&#039;t see large numbers of actual combat troops going there in any case, but think regardless of which regional conflict they aim to work on first, that will bring more troops/aid/training to Georgia as they are involved in most of the issues. 

The State Dept&#039;s mention about Georgia being a transit point for terrorists is odd though as we&#039;d rather want to bolster Georgian strength and security in the region not deal a blow to it by bad international press coverage that could have been avoided. In addition, it gives the Russians ammunition to use against Georgia. Therefore, I have to imagine that they released this story for a reason, such as to provide legitimate cover for more troops to go without irking Russia too much.

This is more what I had in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear you chiming in. Turkmenistan was a thought. Considering Russia and Iran, who also share the Caspian, are out of US reach/influence, and Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are already coming our way, Turkmenistan would be the only other country to possibly be courted.</p>
<p>As for Georgia, we&#8217;ll have to see. I don&#8217;t see large numbers of actual combat troops going there in any case, but think regardless of which regional conflict they aim to work on first, that will bring more troops/aid/training to Georgia as they are involved in most of the issues. </p>
<p>The State Dept&#8217;s mention about Georgia being a transit point for terrorists is odd though as we&#8217;d rather want to bolster Georgian strength and security in the region not deal a blow to it by bad international press coverage that could have been avoided. In addition, it gives the Russians ammunition to use against Georgia. Therefore, I have to imagine that they released this story for a reason, such as to provide legitimate cover for more troops to go without irking Russia too much.</p>
<p>This is more what I had in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

