<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sons of the Conquerors:  The Rise of the Turkic World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/</link>
	<description>All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/comment-page-1/#comment-56879</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5857#comment-56879</guid>
		<description>Wow, comparing Ataturk to Karimov?  That&#039;s really silly.  But if he&#039;s going to do that he might as well call Turkmenbashi the New Ataturk.  I mean, after all, that&#039;s who Turkmenbashi&#039;s must want to be, right? 

It&#039;s funny how Ataturk is such an admired guy by much of the Islamic world that many autocratic, uninspiring leaders want to copy him.  But inevitably what these hacks end up doing is copying the authoritarianism of Ataturk but leaving out the moderisation and liberalisation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, comparing Ataturk to Karimov?  That&#8217;s really silly.  But if he&#8217;s going to do that he might as well call Turkmenbashi the New Ataturk.  I mean, after all, that&#8217;s who Turkmenbashi&#8217;s must want to be, right? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how Ataturk is such an admired guy by much of the Islamic world that many autocratic, uninspiring leaders want to copy him.  But inevitably what these hacks end up doing is copying the authoritarianism of Ataturk but leaving out the moderisation and liberalisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/comment-page-1/#comment-56555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5857#comment-56555</guid>
		<description>Nope, not really. There&#039;s a relationship, but Turkey&#039;s (at least initial) goal of being the leader of the Turkic world doesn&#039;t jibe with Uzbekistan&#039;s desire for independence and regional hegemony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, not really. There&#8217;s a relationship, but Turkey&#8217;s (at least initial) goal of being the leader of the Turkic world doesn&#8217;t jibe with Uzbekistan&#8217;s desire for independence and regional hegemony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Narins</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/comment-page-1/#comment-56550</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Narins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5857#comment-56550</guid>
		<description>Now, I imagine that during the Soviet period links between the Uzbeks and the Turks was pretty low (and, yes, I know the difference between Turkish, Turkic, Altaic, et cetera).

Since then, would you say things have taken off between the two?

If you were stuck for a way to talk to the Uzbeks, would the Turks be people to talk to?

Just idle thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I imagine that during the Soviet period links between the Uzbeks and the Turks was pretty low (and, yes, I know the difference between Turkish, Turkic, Altaic, et cetera).</p>
<p>Since then, would you say things have taken off between the two?</p>
<p>If you were stuck for a way to talk to the Uzbeks, would the Turks be people to talk to?</p>
<p>Just idle thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Central Asia: Book review</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/08/20/sons-of-the-conquerors-the-rise-of-the-turkic-world/comment-page-1/#comment-56547</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Central Asia: Book review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5857#comment-56547</guid>
		<description>[...] kmenistan, Uzbekistan			Global Roundups 					 									Reuters correspondent Hugh Pope has a new book out about Turkic political cultures, which catches the eye of Laurence at Registan  			 			Luisetta Mu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kmenistan, Uzbekistan			Global Roundups 					 									Reuters correspondent Hugh Pope has a new book out about Turkic political cultures, which catches the eye of Laurence at Registan  			 			Luisetta Mu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

