<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Entirely Disconnect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2005/09/06/dont-entirely-disconnect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/09/06/dont-entirely-disconnect/</link>
	<description>All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/09/06/dont-entirely-disconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-60894</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5914#comment-60894</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I agree that this is not a particularly well written argument. I was surprised to see it at all in a US paper at this time though.

I certainly think that she&#039;s missing that while both the US and Uzbekistan share those goals, the Uzbeks, as you say, do so because they are a direct threat to the power of the regime rather than because they are ills in and of themselves.

What I didn&#039;t mention in the post because I felt like it opened up the need for a few more paragraphs I didn&#039;t feel like writing is that I think one of the advantages of Uzbek hostility towards the West and the weakening of ties is that it affords us a greater opportunity to speak more bluntly and to take steps that more directly undermine the government. Not that I think that we will unless officials in Washington suddenly decide Uzbekistan is a high priority. But I do hold out some hope that Chris Smith and a few other members of Congress will press for some sort of concrete and meaningful response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I agree that this is not a particularly well written argument. I was surprised to see it at all in a US paper at this time though.</p>
<p>I certainly think that she&#8217;s missing that while both the US and Uzbekistan share those goals, the Uzbeks, as you say, do so because they are a direct threat to the power of the regime rather than because they are ills in and of themselves.</p>
<p>What I didn&#8217;t mention in the post because I felt like it opened up the need for a few more paragraphs I didn&#8217;t feel like writing is that I think one of the advantages of Uzbek hostility towards the West and the weakening of ties is that it affords us a greater opportunity to speak more bluntly and to take steps that more directly undermine the government. Not that I think that we will unless officials in Washington suddenly decide Uzbekistan is a high priority. But I do hold out some hope that Chris Smith and a few other members of Congress will press for some sort of concrete and meaningful response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David l</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/09/06/dont-entirely-disconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-60893</link>
		<dc:creator>David l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5914#comment-60893</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I&#039;m sure your argument along the same lines would be far more nuanced - this is just badly written and poorly argued. I don&#039;t think the Uzbek govt really has &quot;shared goals includ[ing] the fights against terrorism, narcotics-trafficking, other transnational crime&#039; as Olga puts it. The Uzbek govt has the goal of remaining in power. Period. If you think the alternative might be worse, then I can see there might be a valid argument for not undermining them too much, but repeating old  chestnuts like &#039;security links leads to democratisation&#039; is not terribly useful. Security links should serve security needs. Education, health, culture, business, sure. But more counter-terrorism training for Uzbek policemen? Surely enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I&#8217;m sure your argument along the same lines would be far more nuanced &#8211; this is just badly written and poorly argued. I don&#8217;t think the Uzbek govt really has &#8220;shared goals includ[ing] the fights against terrorism, narcotics-trafficking, other transnational crime&#8217; as Olga puts it. The Uzbek govt has the goal of remaining in power. Period. If you think the alternative might be worse, then I can see there might be a valid argument for not undermining them too much, but repeating old  chestnuts like &#8216;security links leads to democratisation&#8217; is not terribly useful. Security links should serve security needs. Education, health, culture, business, sure. But more counter-terrorism training for Uzbek policemen? Surely enough already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Uzbekistan: Avoiding isolation</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/09/06/dont-entirely-disconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-60891</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Uzbekistan: Avoiding isolation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=5914#comment-60891</guid>
		<description>[...] ntral Asia Uzbekistan			Global Roundups 					 									Registan revisits the argument that it would be a mistake for the United States entirely to cut off ties with Uzbekistan over its human rights record [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ntral Asia Uzbekistan			Global Roundups 					 									Registan revisits the argument that it would be a mistake for the United States entirely to cut off ties with Uzbekistan over its human rights record [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

