<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cohen Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/</link>
	<description>Central Asia News -- All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grigory</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-73111</link>
		<dc:creator>grigory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=6006#comment-73111</guid>
		<description>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&amp;sid=aldmIaJaxJjk
Kyrgyzstan Says U.S. Can Keep Using Its Air Base for Afghan War

Kyrgyzstan today assured the U.S. it can use a use a key air base on its territory as long as needed to support the war in Afghanistan.

&quot;We support the presence of coalition forces in the Kyrgyz Republic until the mission of fighting terrorism in Afghanistan is completed,&quot; read a joint statement signed by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Kyrgyzstan&#039;s newly elected president, Kurmanbek Bakiyev.

Rice visited the former Soviet republic as part of a Central Asian tour aimed at boosting democratic reform, cooperating on counter-terrorism and bolstering U.S. influence in the energy-rich area where Russia and China are also vying for increased access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&#038;sid=aldmIaJaxJjk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&#038;sid=aldmIaJaxJjk</a><br />
Kyrgyzstan Says U.S. Can Keep Using Its Air Base for Afghan War</p>
<p>Kyrgyzstan today assured the U.S. it can use a use a key air base on its territory as long as needed to support the war in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>&#8220;We support the presence of coalition forces in the Kyrgyz Republic until the mission of fighting terrorism in Afghanistan is completed,&#8221; read a joint statement signed by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Kyrgyzstan&#8217;s newly elected president, Kurmanbek Bakiyev.</p>
<p>Rice visited the former Soviet republic as part of a Central Asian tour aimed at boosting democratic reform, cooperating on counter-terrorism and bolstering U.S. influence in the energy-rich area where Russia and China are also vying for increased access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-73053</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=6006#comment-73053</guid>
		<description>I think the State Dept. protocol manual (among other sources) says that for unmarried women &quot;Miss&quot; is proper.  I would argue that in the case of our current Secretary of State, &quot;Secretary Rice&quot; or &quot;Dr. Rice&quot; would be most appropriate.  &lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; consistently uses &quot;Ms Rice&quot;.  

In my personal opinion (and I have some backing on this), &quot;Ms&quot; should be reserved for cases where you don&#039;t know the marital status, the woman is divorced, but has kept her husband&#039;s name (Ms. Jane Public is no longer Mrs. John Q. Public), or the woman prefers it.  Obviously, the person&#039;s preference is paramount; that&#039;s what being well-mannered is all about.  (This has a limit; if you&#039;re an American university student and wish to be addressed as &quot;His Excellency Thomas Lord Fairfax, Baron Cameron&quot;, that&#039;s just too bad.)  That said, it is not clear what Dr. Rice prefers.  

Of course, newspapers tend to stick to Mr/Ms/Dr, whereas my rules are based more on how you&#039;d address a wedding invitation or other formal correspondance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the State Dept. protocol manual (among other sources) says that for unmarried women &#8220;Miss&#8221; is proper.  I would argue that in the case of our current Secretary of State, &#8220;Secretary Rice&#8221; or &#8220;Dr. Rice&#8221; would be most appropriate.  <i>The Economist</i> consistently uses &#8220;Ms Rice&#8221;.  </p>
<p>In my personal opinion (and I have some backing on this), &#8220;Ms&#8221; should be reserved for cases where you don&#8217;t know the marital status, the woman is divorced, but has kept her husband&#8217;s name (Ms. Jane Public is no longer Mrs. John Q. Public), or the woman prefers it.  Obviously, the person&#8217;s preference is paramount; that&#8217;s what being well-mannered is all about.  (This has a limit; if you&#8217;re an American university student and wish to be addressed as &#8220;His Excellency Thomas Lord Fairfax, Baron Cameron&#8221;, that&#8217;s just too bad.)  That said, it is not clear what Dr. Rice prefers.  </p>
<p>Of course, newspapers tend to stick to Mr/Ms/Dr, whereas my rules are based more on how you&#8217;d address a wedding invitation or other formal correspondance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-72990</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=6006#comment-72990</guid>
		<description>&quot;Miss Rice&quot;?  I was under the impression that once someone was a &quot;Madame Secretary,&quot; the proper term of address was &quot;Ms&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Miss Rice&#8221;?  I was under the impression that once someone was a &#8220;Madame Secretary,&#8221; the proper term of address was &#8220;Ms&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current World Affairs - CWA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rice&#8217;s tough mission in Central Asia</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-72551</link>
		<dc:creator>Current World Affairs - CWA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rice&#8217;s tough mission in Central Asia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=6006#comment-72551</guid>
		<description>[...] Read a good insight of the current mood and hopes from Registan.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read a good insight of the current mood and hopes from Registan.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2005/10/09/cohen-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-72546</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/?p=6006#comment-72546</guid>
		<description>This line of Cohen&#039;s op-ed bears mentioning, IMHO:&lt;blockquote&gt;    Whatever she does, anchoring U.S. interests in Central Asia can only be a two-way street, in which America gives, not only takes, and listens, not only lectures.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This line of Cohen&#8217;s op-ed bears mentioning, IMHO:<br />
<blockquote>    Whatever she does, anchoring U.S. interests in Central Asia can only be a two-way street, in which America gives, not only takes, and listens, not only lectures.  </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

