Visit Turkmenistan’s Great Forest!

by Nathan Hamm on 3/14/2006 · 7 comments

Turkmenbashi’s efforts at manipulating nature continue. His latest project for reshaping Turkmenistan’s environment is to plant a great forest. The goal is to improve the country’s climate.

Niyazov said his plan foresees a forest of trees stretching 1,000 square kilometers across the country. He said every government ministry is tasked with planting some of the trees within three years.

He also wants that lake he ordered to be built out in the desert finished quicker.


Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 2974 posts on Registan.net.

Nathan is the Founding Editor and Publisher of Registan.net, which he launched in 2003. He was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Uzbekistan 2000-2001 and received his MA in Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington in 2007. Since 2007, he has worked full-time as an analyst, consulting with private and government clients on Central Asian affairs, specializing in how socio-cultural and political factors shape risks and opportunities and how organizations can adjust their strategic and operational plans to account for these variables. Nathan is currently seeking research, analysis, and consulting opportunities. He can be contacted via Twitter or email.

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

{ 7 comments }

Brian March 15, 2006 at 7:45 pm

I wonder how that project for the big lake in the desert is going? Or the palace made out of ice?

Reply

elizabeth March 16, 2006 at 7:36 am

It all does remind one of that Chocolate Palace scene in the Johnny Depp version of ‘Willy Wonka’.

Reply

Karakum March 19, 2006 at 4:46 pm

Manipulating the news – not sure; manipulating the news – looks more likely. No offense.

Reply

Nathan March 19, 2006 at 4:48 pm

Again, me, them? What’s your point? Did he not say he wants a forest planted?

Reply

Karakum March 19, 2006 at 6:16 pm

Oops, typo: manipulating the nature – not sure; manipulating the news – more likely. The latter refers to your original source (RFERL) not you.

Got it now? See, you don’t have to be defensive.

Reply

Nathan March 19, 2006 at 6:19 pm

No, I actually feel like I must. If someone is being critical, I like to see clarity.

So, did he or did he not say these things? How is RFE/RL manipulating the story?

Reply

Karakum March 19, 2006 at 6:27 pm

Just responded above. Let me know if not clear still. Thanks.

Reply

Previous post:

Next post: