<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Might Be Turning Around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/</link>
	<description>Central Asia News -- All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Strick</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/comment-page-1/#comment-374535</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Strick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/#comment-374535</guid>
		<description>Indeed I think this post may have been premature.  The taking of civilian lives is one of the most serious defects of a military-based approach to the problems in Afghanistan.  And it&#039;s important not to forget casualties of such bombings.  If there were 80 dead, there will have been many more wounded.

AfghanWire has a new podcast this week with Vanni Cappelli commenting on civilian casualties.  I think it&#039;s well worth a listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed I think this post may have been premature.  The taking of civilian lives is one of the most serious defects of a military-based approach to the problems in Afghanistan.  And it&#8217;s important not to forget casualties of such bombings.  If there were 80 dead, there will have been many more wounded.</p>
<p>AfghanWire has a new podcast this week with Vanni Cappelli commenting on civilian casualties.  I think it&#8217;s well worth a listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/comment-page-1/#comment-374533</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/#comment-374533</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t make a good case for optimism.  This &quot;fighting off the insurgents&quot; is somewhat short lived.  The Taliban just move back in when they get a chance.

As for the mounting civilian casualties, I rather doubt that this means much to most Afghans -- If I were them, I would feel it&#039;s quite a cynical gesture, indicating only how little the US values Afghan lives ($3000 a person).

I can only imagine that ordinary (or organized) Afghans are only seething, and I wonder when the next accident will happen that will trigger some kind of public outrage as seen by the riots in Kabul last May -- which took everyone by surprise.  Imagine all that had precipitated that outburst pales in comparison to what has been going on recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t make a good case for optimism.  This &#8220;fighting off the insurgents&#8221; is somewhat short lived.  The Taliban just move back in when they get a chance.</p>
<p>As for the mounting civilian casualties, I rather doubt that this means much to most Afghans &#8212; If I were them, I would feel it&#8217;s quite a cynical gesture, indicating only how little the US values Afghan lives ($3000 a person).</p>
<p>I can only imagine that ordinary (or organized) Afghans are only seething, and I wonder when the next accident will happen that will trigger some kind of public outrage as seen by the riots in Kabul last May &#8212; which took everyone by surprise.  Imagine all that had precipitated that outburst pales in comparison to what has been going on recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Foust</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/comment-page-1/#comment-374532</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/#comment-374532</guid>
		<description>It seems like a good idea, doesn&#039;t it? And it allowed the French to consolidate a lot of their power in North Africa... but then it also failed during the Algerian independence. I don&#039;t think NATO has adopted oil spot theory, though, at least officially.  I think they just don&#039;t have the resources to do all the missions they want, and they&#039;d rather focus on ones with a higher chance of long-term success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a good idea, doesn&#8217;t it? And it allowed the French to consolidate a lot of their power in North Africa&#8230; but then it also failed during the Algerian independence. I don&#8217;t think NATO has adopted oil spot theory, though, at least officially.  I think they just don&#8217;t have the resources to do all the missions they want, and they&#8217;d rather focus on ones with a higher chance of long-term success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lachlan</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/comment-page-1/#comment-374531</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/index.php/2007/05/10/it-might-be-turning-around/#comment-374531</guid>
		<description>For &#039;insouciance&#039; read &#039;oil-spot&#039; theory of counter-insurgency. The idea is not to physically dominate as much territory as possible / annihilate the enemy military. Instead, the intention is to consolidate acceptance of central government rule in the strongest areas, encourage the rejection of insurgents and then spread out once a good example has been set. Prudent no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For &#8216;insouciance&#8217; read &#8216;oil-spot&#8217; theory of counter-insurgency. The idea is not to physically dominate as much territory as possible / annihilate the enemy military. Instead, the intention is to consolidate acceptance of central government rule in the strongest areas, encourage the rejection of insurgents and then spread out once a good example has been set. Prudent no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

