Georgia Goes on the Offensive

by Joshua Foust on 8/19/2007 · 1 comment

Lately, it has become increasingly undeniable that Russia tried to fire a missile at a Georgian radio station. Georgia seems determined to move the case up to the UN and convene a more formal hearing. I would imagine they’re sick of Russia’s continuous stream of air raids on their territory, and are looking for some international legitimacy to their complaint.

They have good cause to be worried. Russia’s military is on its own surge, rapidly building out capabilities and equipment that was lost to the post-Soviet decay. More worrisome that mere equipment buildup is Putin’s push to turn the SCO from an economic bloc to a military one. I would wager China isn’t as enthused about that, as they don’t want to be put in the position of having to challenge the U.S. dominance (both countries benefit too much from the status quo).

Regardless, it is difficult to deny Russia is trying to reassert itself militarily, as well as diplomatically and economically. In a broad sense, the idea of Russia Back As Great Power can be seen in the push to punish kalashnikov counterfeiters—just another way in which Russia is attempting to become a normal, functional country again (though whether Russia ever was a normal, functional country is up for debate).

What this ultimately means isn’t at all clear. Russia must become used to the two-sided (or three-sided, if you’re feeling generous) contest in its near abroad once more; and it must realize that, far from a Britain feverishly trying to protect India, it must now deal with hungry (and angry) oil sharks that will not hesitate to push back, and push back hard, should the need come. If I were a small-ish country and it came down to a choice between Russia and China, for example, I’d choose China.

So Georgia is right to be worried. Despite Saakashvili’s sometimes childish behavior (borne of his assumption of the U.S. automatically and always taking his side), Georgia has every right to protest Russia’s involvement in its affairs, and should be entitled to compensation. On the other side, Russia should be willing to pay Georgia damages for its illegal and unwarranted incursions into Georgia sovereignty.

Of course, like everything else involving Georgia and Russia, nothing will actually happen. Georgia will flap its arms, get a few western countries to coo, “yes, what a terrible thing” and beyond that nothing will come of it. Which is too bad, as it might be an interesting case to see just how or when or if Russia’s growing power might be constrained. Alas.


Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 1801 posts on Registan.net.

Joshua Foust is a Fellow at the American Security Project and the author of Afghanistan Journal: Selections from Registan.net. His research focuses primarily on Central and South Asia. Joshua is a correspondent for The Atlantic and a columnist for PBS Need to Know. Joshua appears regularly on the BBC World News, Aljazeera, and international public radio. Joshua is also a regular contributor to Foreign Policy’s AfPak Channel, and his writing has appeared in the New York Times, Reuters, and the Christian Science Monitor. Follow him on twitter: @joshuafoust

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

{ 1 comment }

W. Shedd August 19, 2007 at 10:39 pm

I don’t think Russia tried to fire a missile at a Georgian radio station.

I believe that they toyed with Georgia, testing their air defenses, and dropped a missile near a new radar station that has been somewhat contentious between the two countries.

Might seem like semantics, I suppose – but I think it is an important difference. Both acts are provocative, but one is an act that they can deny and the other (firing a missile) is one they couldn’t not reasonably deny.

I have the impression that China is quite eager to see the U.S. air base removed from Bishkek. They also still covet Taiwan, which the U.S. essentially defends. Russia supports the “One China” mantra, so the two nations forming a political and military block makes a great deal of sense. They have been trading in arms for years, are set to trade more petroleum and gas resources, and are the likely allies. China is simply more intertwined with the U.S. economy. But even that has almost reached the point where the U.S. needs China more than vice versa.

Reply

Previous post:

Next post: