Last Respects

by Michael Hancock-Parmer on 6/15/2008 · 6 comments

Chingiz Aitmatov

Read the obituary at Global Voices Online.

Chingiz Aitmatov {Чыңгыз Айтматов} passed away this week in Nuremberg, Germany. On May 16th, Aitmatov suffered kidney failure. His health steadily declined, and he was reportedly in a coma before he passed on June 10th. His funeral was held yesterday, June 14th, in Bishkek. Thousands came to view the writer lying in state, and state representatives from Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan were in attendance. He is buried near his father’s grave in Ata-Beyit cemetery, 12.5 miles south of the capital. He is survived by his wife, children, and numerous relations.

Aitmatov wrote literature in both Russian and Kyrgyz, and he was far away the most well known figure of Kyrgyz literature, not counting the fictional hero Manas of the eponymous epic. Born a nomad in December 12th, 1928 in Kyrgyzstan, his family led the wandering life of the majority of Kyrgyz for most of his childhood. With the changes in the country and the Communist practices sweeping into Central Asia, his father was executed in 1937 for “bourgeois nationalism,” one of the backlash movements from Moscow to keep the various Moscow-endowed nationalities in check. He is best known in the west for his first novel, The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years (1980). Along with his later novels, it was translated into several languages, an astonishing feat for a Central Asian writer, especially one that used to write for Pravda. In addition to his literary work, Chinghiz Aitmatov was the Kyrgyzstan ambassador to the EU, NATO, UNESCO, and the Benelux countries. His son is a former foreign minister of Kyrgyzstan, Askar Aitmatov.

Both his writing and artwork were admired while he was alive, and Aitmatov received many awards from the State and various institutions. He was respected as a man who had seen nearly every niche available in life in Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Born a nomad, the son of civil servants, he would find work as an assistant to his Village’s Secretary of the Soviet, as a tax collector, a loader, an engineer’s assistant, a writer, an editor, an artist, and a journalist. His first educational efforts were pointed towards animal husbandry at the Kirghiz Agricultural Institute in Frunze [Soviet-era Biskhek] before turning to literary pursuits at the prestigious Maxim Gorkiy Literature Institute in Moscow, where he lived from 1956 to 1958. Following that he worked for Pravda, until his literary career had gained enough support to allow him to concentrate solely on his writing.

His works are monumental, and worth reading by anyone. He is not an academic writer, but his works teach more effectively about the life and traditions of the Central Asian people in the last century than any single ethnographic text. The human element makes his books so approachable that even your mother in Chicago would appreciate them, and I can’t recommend them enough.

This is a sad week for Kyrgyzstan.


Subscribe to receive updates from Registan

This post was written by...

– author of 158 posts on Registan.net.

Michael earned an MA in Central Eurasian Studies in 2011 and remains a student at Indiana University pursuing a dual PhD in Russian History and Central Eurasian Studies. He served 6 months in the Peace Corps in Uzbekistan in 2005. After the events in Andijan and the subsequent closure of the program, he served 2 years in southern Kazakhstan, returning to the Midwest in 2007. His general area of interest is on post-Timur Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, centered on the Syr Darya river valley.

For information on reproducing this article, see our Terms of Use

{ 6 comments }

Jay June 15, 2008 at 12:51 pm

He was certainly a cracking writer, a good cultural diplomat, and, until his death, Kyrgyzstan’s only living national treasure even if in later life he opted to shy away from asserting his obvious popularity in a more political way, particularly at times of crisis. Akaev did owe his presidential elevation in a large way to him but such was Aitmatov’s trans-regional popularity that Bakiev could not accuse him of partisanship.
I do have a question though which someone might answer. I seem to recall reading an article in Nasha Gazeta, one of Ireland’s two Russian newspapers, back in Jan/Feb that stated Chingiz had been dismissed from his post as Benelux ambassador. The article pointed out the irony of 2008 having been declared Year of Chingiz Aitmatov… Was there some nudging from home or is there some other explanation…?

Reply

Michael Hancock June 15, 2008 at 8:10 pm

I haven’t heard anything regarding the cooling of the political relationship fostered by parties inside Kyrgyzstan with Aitmatov. It’s something to look out for.

Reply

Shohmurod June 16, 2008 at 1:25 pm

Bless his soul. May we all learn something from his respect for all living things, values for humanity and philosophy of life.

Reply

Michael Hancock June 16, 2008 at 2:49 pm

I’m reading “Plakha” right now [the English translation, of course, considering my lackluster Russian]. It’ll be my next review, hopefully by the end of this week. The title of the translation is “The Place of the Skull.” It’s excellent thus far, which can’t be a surprise to those familiar with his work.

Reply

student June 16, 2008 at 2:56 pm

I was very impressed by his book “The day that lasts hundred years”. May he rest in peace.

Reply

Turgai Sangar June 17, 2008 at 7:15 am

“Kyrgyzstan’s only living national treasure even if in later life he opted to shy away from asserting his obvious popularity in a more political way, particularly at times of crisis.”

I agree with that. The question now is who his intellectual heirs are, or who will take over the torch of Kyrgyz arts at least at the international level? Besides Aitmatov there was not much in terms of literature coming from independent Kyrgyzstan but that is because the dire ’90s were no time for literature in the ex-Soviet space. Yet Kyrgyz arts somewhat hit the international spotlights again in the early 2000s with film makers like Aktan Arym Kubat (Aktan Abdukaykov), Marat Sarulu and Ernest Abdyjaparov all of whom did excellent work. Perhaps Kyrgyz film makers are the true heirs of Aitmatov?

All this being said, Aitmatov was indeed great a cultural personality and this is how he will be remembered even if his political record was more controversial (Right, nothing but good about the dead. But the again you have to balance the eulogies in order to remember a person in a more realistic way). He was compromised with the unpopular Akayev government (though not as badly as UZ’s “ethnopop icon” Yulduz Usmanova is with Karimov): a long-standing KG ambassador post, his son was Akayev’s last MFA, … In KG he was seen as such too, which stained his aura a bit, especially during the later Akayev years and during the coup in KG in 2005.

What Tajik journalist Fahriddin Kolbek observed (”В жизни я один раз слышал плохое об Айтматове. В Бишкеке таксист недовольно высказался, что “аксакал Айтматов предал кыргызов, поставил сына министром иностранных дел, работает с Акаевым, служит его “семейке”, ушел далеко от бедствующего народа” at http://ru.tajikistan.neweurasia.net/?p=247 )

I heard this too in KG, not one time but several times and from different kinds of people: “Akayev bought him off with a diplomatic post”; “he is sitting there comfortably in the Benelux, he doesn’t know reality here”; “he’s as self-serving as other politicians”; etc…

But I don’t think it’s all his fault. He was first of all a literate, who got caught up in a political reality.

Reply

Previous post:

Next post: