<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Nasty Déjà Vu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://registan.net/index.php/2009/05/07/a-nasty-deja-vu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2009/05/07/a-nasty-deja-vu/</link>
	<description>All Central Asia, All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MILNEWS.ca</title>
		<link>http://registan.net/index.php/2009/05/07/a-nasty-deja-vu/comment-page-1/#comment-380161</link>
		<dc:creator>MILNEWS.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.registan.net/index.php/2009/05/07/a-nasty-deja-vu/#comment-380161</guid>
		<description>Good points you raise, but one other element bears exploration - even if the military does everything right from a comms perspective, how much of what they say ends up in the material CF (Common Folk) see/hear/read?  

With many news decision makers, anything a government source says is taken with a FAR bigger grain of salt than what the source considered the underdog says.  

An interesting experiment anyone with internet access can try:  read a media story, then try to track down the transcript of the interview or briefing, and compare.  You&#039;ll be surprised...

One can control what they say to the media, but one can&#039;t control what the media hears, what they write and what ends up out there (three different aspects of a similar problem).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points you raise, but one other element bears exploration &#8211; even if the military does everything right from a comms perspective, how much of what they say ends up in the material CF (Common Folk) see/hear/read?  </p>
<p>With many news decision makers, anything a government source says is taken with a FAR bigger grain of salt than what the source considered the underdog says.  </p>
<p>An interesting experiment anyone with internet access can try:  read a media story, then try to track down the transcript of the interview or briefing, and compare.  You&#8217;ll be surprised&#8230;</p>
<p>One can control what they say to the media, but one can&#8217;t control what the media hears, what they write and what ends up out there (three different aspects of a similar problem).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

